Lateral Tarsal Strip versus Tensor Fascia Lata Sling for Paralytic Ectropion: Comparison and Long-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Paralytic ectropion increases risk for corneal injury in facial palsy patients. Although a lateral tarsal strip (LTS) provides corneal coverage through superolateral lower eyelid pull, the unopposed lateral force may result in lateral displacement of the lower eyelid punctum and overall worsening asymmetry. A tensor fascia lata (TFL) lower eyelid sling may overcome some of these limitations. This study quantitatively compares scleral show, punctum deviation, lower marginal reflex distance, and periorbital symmetry between the two techniques. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed on facial paralysis patients who underwent LTS or TFL sling surgery with no prior lower lid suspension procedures. Standardized preoperative and postoperative images in primary gaze position were used to measure scleral show and lower punctum deviation using ImageJ, and lower marginal reflex distance using Emotrics. RESULTS: Of 449 facial paralysis patients, 79 met inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven underwent LTS surgery and 22 underwent TFL sling surgery. Compared with preoperatively, lower medial scleral show improved significantly with both LTS (10.9 mm 2 ; P < 0.01) and TFL (14.7 mm 2 ; P < 0.01). The LTS group showed significant worsening of horizontal and vertical lower punctum deviation when compared with the TFL group (both P < 0.01). The LTS group was unable to achieve periorbital symmetry between the healthy and paralytic eye across all parameters measured postoperatively ( P < 0.01); and the TFL group achieved symmetry in medial scleral show, lateral scleral show, and lower punctum deviation. CONCLUSION: In patients with paralytic ectropion, TFL sling provides similar outcomes to LTS, with the added advantages of symmetry without lateralization or caudalization of the lower medial punctum. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Long-Term Outcomes After Pediatric Tracheostomy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether long-term outcomes after pediatric tracheostomy are impacted by neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage. METHODS: A prospective cohort of children with tracheostomies was followed at an academic pediatric hospital between 2015 and 2020. Patients were grouped into low or high socioeconomic disadvantage using their neighborhood area deprivation index (ADI). Survival and logistic regression analyses determined the relationship between ADI group, decannulation, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 260 children were included with a median age at tracheostomy of 6.6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3.9-42.3). The cohort was 53% male (N = 138), 55% White race (N = 143), and 35% Black or African American (N = 90). Tracheostomy was most frequently indicated for respiratory failure (N = 189, 73%). High neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was noted for 66% of children (N = 172) and 61% (N = 158) had severe neurocognitive disability. ADI was not associated with time to decannulation (HR = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.53-1.53) or time to death (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.49-1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was not associated with decannulation or mortality among children with a tracheostomy. These findings suggest that long-term outcomes after pediatric tracheostomy are less dependent on socioeconomic factors in an individual community. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:2415-2421, 2024.

Training Students as Navigators for Patients Experiencing Homelessness.

Background and Objectives: Despite the significant effects of homelessness on health, medical and health professions students rarely receive formal education in caring for individuals experiencing homelessness. We describe the implementation and evaluation of a novel student-run Patient Navigator Program (PNP) and its prerequisite elective that trains students in patient navigation principles specific to homelessness in the local community. METHODS: We analyzed pre- and postsurvey matched responses from students immediately before and after course completion. The survey utilizes the externally-validated instruments Health Professional Attitudes Toward the Homeless Inventory (HPATHI) and the Student-Run Free Clinic Project (SRFCP) survey. We examined differences using paired t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Students also completed separate end-of-curriculum evaluation forms assessing satisfaction with the course. RESULTS: After completing the elective, students (n=45) demonstrated improvement in self-assessed attitude towards individuals experiencing homelessness (P=.03), specifically an increase in reported social advocacy (P<.001); and an increase in self-perceived knowledge about (P<.001), efficacy in working with (P=.01), and skills in caring for (P<.001) underserved groups. The elective also received high student satisfaction ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Formal education in patient navigation and caring for individuals experiencing homelessness improves self-assessed preparedness of future health care providers in serving homeless and underserved populations.

Cross Facial Nerve Grafting for Smile Restoration: Thoughts on Improving Graft Inset.

Cross facial nerve grafts (CFNGs) are one of the most ubiquitous and time-honored surgical tools used in facial reanimation. They may be used for targeting different mimetic muscles in the subacute setting as well as to innervate newly placed muscle flaps in varied facial subunits. In our experience, when used specifically for smile reanimation in two-stage strategies with either traditional "babysitting" approaches in nerve transfers or free functional muscle transfers, the second stage may present some challenges in CFNG identification as well as injury to the previously banked nerve graft. We present some technical modifications in the first-stage CFNG inset that can make the second stage easier and safer. These modifications include: (1) marking the course of the nerve graft with surgical metal clips and inserting loose circumferential sutures throughout the distal course of the nerve in the recipient area to avoid displacement; (2) transferring the nerve graft through the nasal sills rather than lips, protecting it from damage during insertion of free functional muscle transfer; and (3) routing the nerve from the lateral nose to the preauricular area over the zygomatic arch, allowing easier dissection and banking of adequate graft length to provide tension-free coaptation with the flexibility of nerve coaptation in variable positions.